The initial research results on the improvement of offshore axial pile capacity calculation using CPTu data at block A, offshore Vietnam
- Tác giả: Can Thanh Truong 1*, Long Kim Le 2, Quyen Van Le 3
Cơ quan:
1 Seahorse Marine & Energy JSC, Ba Ria – Vung Tau, Vietnam
2 PTSC Geos & Subsea Services Co, Ba Ria – Vung Tau, Vietnam
3 Freelance Consultant in Geotechnical Research, Hanoi, Vietnam
- *Tác giả liên hệ:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
- Từ khóa: API RP 2A-WSD, API RP 2GEO, Axial pile capacity, Calculation and prediction, CPTu, CPT-based methods, The offshore.
- Nhận bài: 28-07-2024
- Sửa xong: 27-10-2024
- Chấp nhận: 06-11-2024
- Ngày đăng: 01-12-2024
- Lĩnh vực: Dầu khí và năng lượng
Tóm tắt:
This paper presents the use of CPTu data in calculation of offshore axial pile capacity based on the CPT-based methods recommended in Appendix C of API RP 2GEO (2014) which are the Simplified ICP-05 Method (Method 1); Offshore UWA-05 Method (Method 2); Fugro-05 Method (Method 3); and NGI-05 Method (Method 4). Formerly, the strength values of cohesionless layers were usually taken from onshore laboratory results or if there were none done, the values were generally assumed based on recommendations of API RP 2A-WSD (2000) standard which often resulted in unconservative axial pile capacity. With the availability of CPTu data which better reflects the in-situ soil conditions, the selection of design parameters for cohesionless layers is improved and consequently, the improved axial capacity calculation both in tension and compression. The improvement in predicted axial pile capacity allows better pile design (for example, choice of pile length, optimization of pile diameter) and hence the economical aspects of the final design at a later design stage. Results from the analyses by CPT-based methods indicate that Method 1, 2 and 3 produce comparable results of capacities in both compression and tension, whereas Method 4 shows somewhat a deviation from the other 3 methods. Hence, a conservative approach to using the capacities calculated by method 4 and especially the API RP 2A-WSD (2000) method should be exercised properly by applying appropriate safety factors.
API RP 2GEO (2014). Geotechnical and Foundation Design Considerations - Recommended Practice 2GEO, (2014). American Petroleum Institute. Washington, D.C. 138 pages.(multiple authors and contributors who aremembers of the RG7 committee).
API RP 2A-WSD (2000). API RP Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms-Working Stress Design, (2000). American Petroleum Institute. Washington, D.C. 242 pages. Multiple authors and contributors who are members of the RG7 committee and its ISO equivalent, Working Group 10 TC7/SC7/WG10.
Field Report of Geotechnical Investigation for Soil Boring and CPTu at BH ST-LQ and CPTu ST-PIP, Block A, Offshore Vietnam, (2014). 103 pages.
Kolk, H. J., and Der Velde, E. (1996). A reliable method to determine friction capacity of piles driven into clays. In Offshore Technology Conference (pp. OTC-7993). OTC.
Mayne, P. W. (2007). Cone penetration testing (Vol. 368). Transportation Research Board.
Nguyen, T. T., Le, V. D., Huynh, T. Q., and Nguyen, N. H. (2024). Influence of Settlement on Base Resistance of Long Piles in Soft Soil-Field and
Machine Learning Assessments.Geotechnics,4(2), 447-469.
Schmertmann, J. H. (1975). Measurement of in situ shear strength, SOA Report. In Proceedings, ASCE Spec. Conference on In Situ Measurement of Soil Properties, Raleigh, NC, 1975 (Vol. 2, pp. 57-138).
Các bài báo khác